Peer-review Process
Submission for publication from academics and researchers must obtain the approval of the Editorial Board for review. Upon its approval, the IP is sent to two reviewers to carry out a double-blind peer review. Reviewers, drawn within and outside the MGI, will be experts in the fields in which the submissions are pitched. Each reviewer will have to fill in a ‘Peer-review Form’ to report on the outcome of his or her evaluation for submission to the Editorial Board. A remuneration will be allocated to the reviewer. The Editorial Board will communicate with the author/s as regards the four following outcomes:
- Submission Rejected
- Submission Accepted Upon Bringing Major Changes
- Submission Accepted Upon Bringing Minor Changes
- Submission Accepted without any Changes